Rimonabant for prevention of cardiovascular events (CRESCENDO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet. 2010 Aug 14;376(9740):517-23
Authors: Topol EJ, Bousser MG, Fox KA, Creager MA, Despres JP, Easton JD, Hamm CW, Montalescot G, Steg PG, Pearson TA, Cohen E, Gaudin C, Job B, Murphy JH, Bhatt DL,
BACKGROUND: Blockade of the endocannabinoid receptor reduces obesity and improves metabolic abnormalities such as triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose. We assessed whether rimonabant would improve major vascular event-free survival. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken in 974 hospitals in 42 countries. 18,695 patients with previously manifest or increased risk of vascular disease were randomly assigned to receive either rimonabant 20 mg (n=9381) or matching placebo (n=9314). Randomisation was stratified by centre, implemented with an independent interactive voice response system, and all study personnel and participants were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, as determined via central adjudication. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00263042. FINDINGS: At a mean follow-up of 13.8 months (95% CI 13.6-14.0), the trial was prematurely discontinued because of concerns by health regulatory authorities in three countries about suicide in individuals receiving rimonabant. All randomised participants were analysed. At the close of the trial (Nov 6, 2008), the composite primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 364 (3.9%) patients assigned to rimonabant and 375 (4.0%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12, p=0.68). With rimonabant, gastrointestinal (3038 [33%] vs 2084 [22%]), neuropsychiatric (3028 [32%] vs 1989 [21%]), and serious psychiatric side-effects (232 [2.5%] vs 120 [1.3%]) were significantly increased compared with placebo. Four patients in the rimonabant group and one in the placebo group committed suicide. INTERPRETATION: The premature termination of this trial has important lessons for drug development. A drug that was being marketed for weight loss, but being tested for improving cardiovascular outcomes, induced a level of serious neuropsychiatric effects that was deemed unacceptable by regulatory authorities, and both the drug and the trial were abruptly terminated. FUNDING: Sanofi-Aventis.
20709233
– Rimonabant for prevention of cardiovascular events (CRESCENDO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial.
Practice implications of recent clinical trials for the prevention of acute kidney injury in cardiovascular surgery.
Hosp Pract (Minneap). 2010 Apr;38(2):67-73
Authors: Shimada M, Dass B, Dhatt GS, Alsabbagh MM, Asmar AR, Ather IM, Sharma R, Ejaz AA
Acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery is a complex problem with associated increased risks for dialysis, short- and long-term mortality, and progression to end-stage renal disease. Interventions to prevent and treat renal complications in this cohort have seldom been uniformly satisfactory due to the differences in strategies for intervention, drug doses and duration of treatment, baseline renal functions, and population studied. Nonetheless, significant advances have been made and include recognition of the effect of preexisting organ dysfunction on renal outcomes, reassessment of existing therapeutic interventions, and exploration of the feasibility of newer agents to prevent and treat acute kidney injury in cardiovascular surgery patients. This article briefly reviews several of these issues with an emphasis on recent clinical trials in this cohort.
20469615
– Practice implications of recent clinical trials for the prevention of acute kidney injury in cardiovascular surgery.
An urgent matter-identifying your patients’ cardiovascular risk and improving their outcomes. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease: the importance of reaching target goals with statin therapy.
J Fam Pract. 2009 Nov;58(11 Suppl Urgent):S32-40
Authors: Lewis SJ
While Managing Acute-Care Issues, family physicians are challenged daily to recognize and treat modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) and to educate patients on the importance of risk reduction. Time constraints and the imperatives of immediate issues make the challenge of identification and treatment of CHD risk difficult. A stunning number of family medicine patients present with 1 or more of the following CHD risk factors: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) =130 mg/dL (33% of American adults), total cholesterol =200 mg/dL (45%), hypertension (33%), tobacco use (21%), sedentary lifestyle (69%), excessive body weight (body mass index =25; 67%), diabetes (8%), or pre-diabetes (26%). The objective of comprehensive therapeutic interventions in CHD, from diet and lifestyle changes, to smoking cessation, to medications, is to prevent new (primary prevention) or recurrent (secondary prevention) cardiovascular events, with the ultimate goal of preventing disability and death. Family physicians have the distinct advantage of seeing patients’ health status from a global perspective, giving them a greater opportunity to recognize risk and initiate preventive interventions. Although therapeutic efforts have been directed traditionally at patients with established CHD and asymptomatic patients at high risk for cardiac events, new data are emerging that suggest that earlier, more aggressive treatment increases clinical benefit. This article (1) reviews the importance of reaching target goals for LDL-C and other biomarkers of risk in the primary and secondary prevention of CHD, and (2) addresses dosing issues and other practical methods of identifying and treating family medicine patients who are at risk.
19891946
– An urgent matter-identifying your patients’ cardiovascular risk and improving their outcomes. Low-density lipoprotein…
